But this is nothing new, as 2010’s OS X 10.7 Lion showed. With the long delay in launching a new Mac Pro, Apple has been accused of ignoring the needs of its pro users. But by focusing on stability and functionality, Apple scored a serious home run that still makes Mac veterans nostalgic. Snow Leopard’s reputation has been somewhat legendary since its launch, and there were a lot of complaints at the time. And on top of that, the price has been slashed from $129 to just $29. From OS X 10.5 software processes were extensively rewritten and apps were made faster, while the visual style remained practically unchanged from its predecessor. Unusually, Apple advertised Snow Leopard as having “zero new features” and instead put all its efforts into improving performance and efficiency. You can’t say that about every version of the Mac operating system. Its reliability and performance have become the stuff of legend even close to a decade and a half since its launch. Mention Snow Leopard to any Apple old timer and you will see their eyes light up as they regale you with tales of this famous operating system. ![]() It’s a testament to how lovingly it was received by users around the world. Tiger was so popular, in fact, that Apple didn’t feel the need to largely replace it for 30 months-the longest stretch for any version of Apple’s Mac operating system. It was a piece of forward thinking that returned when the Mac switched to Apple silicon. To help facilitate this, Tiger included the first version of Rosetta, a built-in tool that could automatically read and run apps designed for PowerPC chips on Intel Macs. The Tiger also launched at a time when Apple began its transition to PowerPC chips and Intel processors. Spotlight, Automator (which paved the way for Shortcuts), and VoiceOver all made their debut on Tiger, along with a vast array of new and improved tools and features that made the operating system widely popular. It may have come out more than 15 years ago, but OS X 10.4 Tiger introduced features that are still in use today. While its visual style was a revelation and created the playbook for future OS X releases, it probably needs a little more time in the oven before launching. ![]() There was a disappointing lack of third-party Mac apps, and some people complained that those shiny new interfaces were hard to use.Īll this combined into a feeling that Cheetah was only half cooked and not quite ready for prime time. Yet it was fraught with issues, including poor performance (even on machines that met the minimum spec), freezes, kernel panics, and more. ![]() Cheetah introduced the Aqua interface, and its bubbly blue buttons and translucent menus became instantly iconic. OS X didn’t get off to the most auspicious start in 2001 with version 10.0 Cheetah, but you wouldn’t know it by looking at it. Let’s explore Apple’s greatest hits - and some of its worst howlers. If Windows is more your speed, we’ve also ranked the best Windows versions of all time. We started with the launch of OS X 10.0 in 2001 and continued through to the present, before the rebranding of the operating system as macOS in 2016. In this article, we’ve chosen the five best versions of Apple’s Mac operating system, as well as its five worst, presented in chronological order. Yet there are also some classic versions that still live on in the memories of Mac users new and old. Throughout the history of MacOS (and OS X before that), there have been some real stinkers that Apple would probably rather we all forget about. Apple’s macOS operating system is known for its stability and features, but it wasn’t always that way.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |